September 27, 2022

Regardless of whether college athletes should be allowed names, images and similar benefits, one aspect of the NIL debate is largely agreed upon: there is uncertainty over the rules governing athletes’ allowances, which lack structure and variation from state to state for high school recruitment. .

As it currently stands across the country, there is widespread variability, with seven states allowing athletes to have their names and similar profits, 17 states considering changing by-laws, and 26 states banning it. Inconsistencies add to the difficulty of hiring because athletes must know how signing a contract that guarantees college finances can affect their high school qualifications.

In Texas, for example, the NIL deal is not approved for high school athletes. And that ban – and perhaps its lack of transparency in Texas – played a role in recruiting the No. 1 football player in the 2022 class, excluding Quinn Evers from her high school senior year to enroll in Ohio State early and signing a NIL deal worth $ 1.4 million.

“I think there are going to be some legislators at some point who are probably talking about it, but it will take a few years,” said Drew Sanders, head coach at Vandegraft (Texas) High School. “… Parents want to make sure that they are not doing something that will cause problems according to their qualifications. This is completely new to everyone, so I have no experience with it. As a coach, I’m not really sure where to take them. “

Uncertainty is nothing new in the immediate context of sports law, whether it is league-specific, like the NFL’s Connection Protocol, or a broader, broader change, such as Title IX.

Ten months after the passage of the NIL policy, subsequent developments probably reflect the NCAA’s adoption of Prop 48 in the mid-1980s, which made it a minimum requirement for high school grades and college entrance exam scores. Today, it is an ideal model. But when it passes, it is controversial.

“It has thrown the whole market into a tailspin because it has really changed the way NCAAs govern their qualifications,” said Randy Ecker, a longtime figure in the sports digital media and technology landscape. “It has completely changed the dynamics, but no one took the time to go to the high school market and teach them what it means and how to do it.”

Although the implementation of Prop 48 lacked resources for the affected athletes, the single sports ecosystem hopes to lead responsibility in this next wave of education. His platform Sports alone Monday announced the launch of an educational services platform that will target high school students, instructors, teachers and administrators with video curriculum, state-by-state information, tools for educators to educate their community and resources, including legal, financial and a network. Tax experts.

The website is a platform for game plan exclusive high school partners, collegiate and professional level partnerships that provide athletes with learning resources, career planning and other development programs.

The price of Ecker Sports Resource Hub varies from state to state, Ecker said.

“Fast-forward even 10 years and it will be a normal part of the athletic landscape and the landscape of athletic education, but today, when we talk to coaches and administrators at the high school level, there is a lot of fear and panic because it is so new,” Ecker said.

The need for education in NIL is much broader than seeking a contract without affecting high school qualifications. Chuck Schmidt, vice president and executive director of Playfly Sports High School and former COO of the Arizona Interscholastic Association, says high school students whose parents’ jobs take them to different states can be unexpectedly affected. Tax obligations must be outlined for athletes. Athletes and families who see the potential for money flow but do not know that the laws can be enforced, by signing with an unqualified person, agreeing to take a huge percentage of money from the agent or accidentally signing a brand without realizing the long term effects Compromise agreement.

The Athletes’ Rights took a huge step forward with the passage of the NIL allowance Yet, the lack of structure at the national level is creating confusion and potential long-term, unpredictable consequences. Acre and Tim Prokup, Chief Commercial Officer at Acre Sports Resource Hub, Hopefully the new platform will help athletes and families create effective NIL strategies

“How great it is for kids to be able to do this has been thrown around the NIL, but there’s always something else to start developing once a decision is made,” Schmidt said. “It’s an environment where every state has its own traditions, laws, state laws and culture. Education … is going to be crucial to the success of what is going to happen. “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.